<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Blog by Andrés Roemer &#187; Happiness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andresroemer.com/blog/en/?feed=rss2&#038;cat=11" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andresroemer.com/blog/en</link>
	<description>Who are we? Where do we come from? What are we made of? Lets open these questions and many others up for discussion. May this be an invitation to think, to reflect about our lives, and the world we live in. I look forward to your comments, in this dialogue of ideas, in order that we might participate in the outcome of another key question: Where are we heading?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:59:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is our purpose in life to be happy?</title>
		<link>http://www.andresroemer.com/blog/en/?p=65</link>
		<comments>http://www.andresroemer.com/blog/en/?p=65#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andres roemer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purpose in life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andresroemer.com/blog/en/?p=65</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s suppose a machine existed that could offer us any experience we desired. Any experience. Let&#8217;s imagine distinguished neuroscientists stimulated our brain so we could think and feel our fantasies, as though these were real. Define your fantastical world view, dear reader; neuroscientists will make all dreams that make you happy possible -your entire life&#8230; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="left" style="float:left;padding:0px 5px 5px 0px;"><a name="fb_share" type="icon" share_url="http://www.andresroemer.com/blog/en/?p=65"></a></div><p><br/>
<div style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.andresroemer.com/images/tankgirlbig.jpg" alt="" /></div>
<p><br/>
<p>Let&#8217;s suppose a machine existed that could offer us  any experience we desired. Any experience. Let&#8217;s imagine distinguished  neuroscientists stimulated our brain so we could think and feel our fantasies,  as though these were real. Define your fantastical world view, dear reader;  neuroscientists will make all dreams that make you happy possible -your entire  life&#8230; But under one condition: to be floating in a tank connected to  electrodes to your brain, making it able for you to “live” the perfect life  simulation.  Two questions:</p>
<p><br/></p>
<ol>
  • Would you hook up to this supermachine preprogrammed  with all your aspirations and fantasies for the rest of your life?
</ol>
<p><br/>
<ol>
  • In fact, I ask: is there something more important in  life than being happy?
</ol>
<p><br/><img class="alignnone" title="hyper" src="http://www.andresroemer.com/images/hyper-en-hapiness.jpg" alt="" width="270" height="55" align="right"/>
<p>Philosopher  Robert Nozick created this experiment in 1974; and he concluded that the answer  to the first question is: “NO” and to the second: “THERE ARE A LOT OF THINGS  THAT MATTER MORE THAN BEING HAPPY.”</p>
<p><br/>
<p>Simple  dilemma: what&#8217;s preferable, a simulated life full of pleasure and happiness or  a <em>real</em> life marked by diverse hopeless, hopeful, happy, loving,  unloving, disillusion, partial success and unfulfilled dreams experiences?<br />
<br/>Despite the  attractiveness and seduction of “being happy one’s entire life”, lots of us  prefer life in its plain existence (highs and lows), instead of happiness under  electrodes.<br/></p>
<p><br/>Real, complex, life, is a purpose in  itself. We want to <em>do and experiment, </em>not just feel pleasure in doing  it. Without a doubt, not all of us are alike. Not everyone thinks like Nozick  or yours truly. There are lots of people that connect their lives to  “substitute electrodes”. They ingest drugs that affect their brain&#8217;s  biochemistry; they assume religions that act as placebos to counteract the  anxiety that brings forth a meaning of death (or a meaning of life).  Or, more commonly yet, they “live on autopilot”  their hours of everyday living, so as not to feel the depth and complexity of  life.<br/></p>
<p><br/><img class="alignnone" title="Happy face" src="http://www.andresroemer.com/images/radioactive-happiness-face.gif" alt="" width="201" height="151" align="left" /> &nbsp;&nbsp;To those of us that renounce the  “virtual &nbsp;&nbsp;happiness tank”, fullness (happiness) has to &nbsp;&nbsp;connect with an intention  to think, feel what is &nbsp;&nbsp;thought, think what is felt. In brief: taking &nbsp;&nbsp;conscience  that the purpose of life is a life with &nbsp;&nbsp;purpose.  Purpose implies being alive. Being &nbsp;&nbsp;alive entails living an examined life.</p>
<p><br/><br />
<br/>
<p>Therapists –  from masseuses to stylists, pseudo-psychologists and personal coaches –  maintain a false belief that people have to feel good with and about themselves  all the time; a notion that socio-biologic science finds fatally unreal.  We all have mishaps, bad days, difficult  periods and “bad luck” days. <br/><br />
  Any masseuse, makeup artist, soccer  player or florist can be an authority to give therapy to those in need. Our  search for a sense of immediate happiness and the frailness of our human nature  make sense of nonsense without psychological sense stemming from therapy. This  is what life’s meaning and understanding of the psyche have fallen into.<br/><br />
  Optimist psychology sustains that  one lives better by enthusiasm than by pessimism (obvious?). But, how much do  we cheat ourselves with the vision that it&#8217;s all in our mind and nothing  exists.<br/><br />
  The relevance, often, is one that  the easy road to happiness doesn&#8217;t bring about. More so, happiness for  neuroscience is not the <em>end</em> of the road, but the road itself.  </p>
<p><br/>
<p>Published in <em>Opinión y Análisis</em><br />
El Universal<br />
Febraury 7<sup>th</sup>, 2009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andresroemer.com/blog/en/?feed=rss2&amp;p=65</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
