Can you trust your brain?

Categories: Brain


It seems to be easier for a camel to pass through a needle’s eye than for a comment or critique to enter our memory. It’s almost impossible for a human brain to take critique without demanding an explanation or justification. All brains bear a huge database of memorable events that deep inside ask themselves; am I good? Am I noble? Am I valuable? But the concept of oneself is malleable to our convenience and to our situations.


Of all events we have experienced in our lives, our memory remembers—in an edited fashion—those which are most convenient to visualize ourselves the way we want to. In fact, our rational arguments are another great defender of our self-deceiving reasoning, feeding that part of the brain that is sheltered by vanity. It is rather paradoxical that our reasoning, the gray matter of our intelligence, drives us in certain circumstances to move away from reality and truth.


Even Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, or groups as the
Hutus or Nazis, looked at themselves as
beings with values that under the oath of
righteousness and virtuosity justified the
atrocities committed. In fact, what to some
is repentance is no more than some kind
of self-indulgence gimmick to assume that they now live in good, that they are indeed, after all, good. The problem is that our brain is not trustworthy, and dedicates itself to work like a personal attorney constantly on the lookout for evidence to exempt us from guilt, rather than to seek the truth as an unbiased jury.


It is quite astonishing that this personal attorney also has the ability to look for “witnesses” to legitimate our cases –identifying books and theories that backup principles and values, such as churches and people that self-proclaim our own language. In summary, our brain is not only entitled to have a tendency to make us believe ourselves superior than average, but that we have been “blessed” by some divine order, with qualities that make us special. The amazing fact is that we are all special, nonetheless. This also leads us to be surrounded by and to spend more time with people that flatter us, accept us and really feel that we are what we would like to see in ourselves.


As if this were not enough, our brain makes us feel that this special manner of being, makes us somehow invulnerable to “statistics” that reflect the “average” of vulnerabilities of “others in life.” For example, we perceive ourselves to be different, different from the rest: “cigarette smoking and alcohol will not hurt us;” “since we are exempted from disease we may undergo unsafe sex;” “our political party is the probable winner;” “Our God and our religion is the true one, therefore we are the chosen ones,” etc., etc., etc. In the end our brain is a great manipulator.


This presents us two morals to the story:
(1) don’t believe everything you think, and
(2) never trust your brain. However, don’t
get mad with your brain for manipulating
your worldview. Actually there are people
that have a better outlook of their place in the
world; people who are overall “more
balanced” about their perceptions. In
general, they are known as “pessimists” and
probably are not as happy. Even though our
self-manipulating brain makes us get sick
less, survive to diseases in an easier way, live
longer and smile more often about life.


The shameful, sad part is that our brain drives us to place responsibility (blame) regarding most of our errors on our fellows and/or the circumstances, like so we repeat the same errors and mistaken patterns intermittently –and sometimes- for life.



Published in Opinión y Análisis

El Universal

January 10th, 2009

4 Responses to “Can you trust your brain?”

  1. Marie-Louise Oosthuysen de Gutierrez Says:

    Dear Andres

    The main function of the brain, is survival. With that in mind, one has to look at the environment in which the individual lives, and how his/her multiple intelligences have developed. Someone with a low emotional IQ and low intrapersonal IQ, and probably also a low self-esteem and a low situational self-confidence (where self-esteem refers to the person and self-confidence to how that person feels in handling the problem/situation at hand), will rather ignore the problem, lie to themselves by convincing themselves that the problem does not exist or doesn’t bother them. This is the situation that you are describing in your article – this person should indeed not trust his own brain. However, those with a higher emotional and intrapersonal IQ will tend to be brutally honest with themselves about the problem, not allowing their own brains to manipulate, make up excuses, or blame the rest of humanity for their shortcomings.

    Marie-Louise Oosthuysen de Gutierrez
    Certified Educational Brain Researcher and Certified Graphologist
    Mexico City, Mexico

  2. Self Esteem Says:

    Thank you so much, there aren’t enough posts on this… keep up the good work

  3. Lamont Croxen Says:

    Thank you for the information provided. The best content I’ve seen in this niche.

  4. Morehead Says:

    Hey! I love your site

Leave a Reply

Security Code:

Follow andruka on Twitter    

Welcome to A Blog by Andrés Roemer

Who are we? Where do we come from? What are we made of? Lets open these questions and many others up for discussion. May this be an invitation to think, to reflect about our lives, and the world we live in. I look forward to your comments, in this dialogue of ideas, in order that we might participate in the outcome of another key question: Where are we heading?



Andrés Roemer

President of Poder Civico and Curator of La Ciudad de las Ideas. Dr. Roemer has been professor at ITAM, Harvard University and UCLA Berkeley. He was awarded with the Don K. Price as the best student in John F. Kennedy School at Harvard University. He has a BA in law from UNAM (Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico) and BS in Economics from ITAM (Instituto Tecnologico Autonomo de Mexico), both with honorific mention. He is a PHD graduate in Public Policy from UCLA Berkeley. Microsoft Fundation has created: Microsoft Award por Distinción en el Servicio a la Comunidad Académica: Andrés Roemer.